Divorce terminates a marriage. It does not terminate parental responsibility.
Under Nigerian law, custody disputes arising from divorce are primarily governed by Section 71 of the Matrimonial Causes Act (MCA). The Act grants courts broad discretionary powers to make orders regarding custody, guardianship, welfare, advancement, and education of children of the marriage.
And discretion is where the battle lies.
The Welfare Principle: The Paramount Consideration
Although the MCA predates the Child Rights Act (CRA), Nigerian courts have increasingly aligned custody decisions with the “best interest of the child” standard enshrined in Section 1 of the CRA.
The child’s welfare is paramount — not equal, not competing, but paramount.
Judges evaluate:
- Emotional stability
- Moral conduct of parents
- Financial capacity
- Educational continuity
- Evidence of abuse or neglect
- Existing bonding patterns
However, welfare is not abstract sentiment. It must be proven with evidence.
Judicial Discretion Is Not Arbitrary
While Section 71 MCA provides flexibility, appellate courts have consistently emphasized that discretion must be exercised judicially and judiciously.
A custody order may be overturned where:
- The court relied on irrelevant considerations
- There was misdirection on law
- Welfare assessment lacked evidentiary support
The implication is clear: custody litigation requires forensic preparation, not emotional rhetoric.
Interim vs. Final Custody Orders
Under Nigerian practice, interim custody may be granted pending final determination of divorce proceedings.
This stage is critical.
Many lawyers underestimate interim proceedings. That is a mistake. Interim arrangements often shape the status quo, and courts are reluctant to disrupt established stability later.
Strategy begins early.
2.
Beyond “Tender Years”: The Evolution of Custody Jurisprudence in Nigeria
For decades, Nigerian courts informally leaned toward maternal preference — especially for children of tender years. However, modern jurisprudence has gradually shifted toward neutrality grounded in welfare analysis.
The presumption favoring mothers is no longer absolute.
The Decline of Automatic Maternal Preference
While courts acknowledge the emotional nurturing typically associated with mothers, this is not a conclusive factor.
Custody has been denied to mothers where:
- There is evidence of immoral conduct impacting the child
- Instability is demonstrated
- The environment is unsuitable
Similarly, fathers increasingly succeed where they demonstrate active caregiving roles.
The determining question remains: What serves the child’s welfare?
Financial Superiority Does Not Determine Custody
A common misconception among litigants is that economic dominance equals custody dominance.
This is legally incorrect.
The court distinguishes between:
- Custody (care and control)
- Maintenance (financial obligation)
A parent may lack superior financial resources yet still secure custody if emotional and moral welfare is better preserved in that home.
The Role of the Child’s Preference
Under the Child Rights Act, courts may consider the wishes of a child capable of forming an independent view.
However, preference is persuasive — not decisive.
Judges remain cautious of coaching, influence, or parental alienation.
The Hard Reality
Custody litigation exposes every weakness in a parent’s life — financial records, lifestyle choices, social conduct, communication history.
As counsel, your duty is not merely advocacy. It is strategic damage control.
3.
Custody Orders, Enforcement, and Modification: The Post-Divorce Battlefield
Winning custody is one phase. Enforcing and maintaining it is another.
Enforcement Challenges in Nigeria
Custody orders may be breached through:
- Denial of visitation
- Unauthorized relocation
- Refusal to return the child
Enforcement requires prompt court intervention. Delay weakens authority and emboldens defiance.
Contempt proceedings may follow willful disobedience.
However, courts are cautious in imposing sanctions that indirectly punish the child.
Relocation and Jurisdictional Issues
Nigeria does not operate within a comprehensive uniform relocation framework. Where a custodial parent seeks to move abroad, judicial permission is required if it materially affects access rights.
Courts examine:
- Motivation for relocation
- Impact on child’s stability
- Feasibility of maintaining contact with the non-custodial parent
Unilateral removal can trigger serious legal consequences.
Variation of Custody Orders
Custody is not immutable.
Under the MCA, courts may vary orders upon proof of material change in circumstances. This includes:
- Remarriage
- Evidence of abuse
- Educational disruption
- Emotional instability in the custodial home
However, the threshold is high. Stability remains a dominant judicial value.
Strategic Takeaway for Practitioners
Custody cases are not won by attacking the other parent recklessly. Courts observe tone, credibility, and maturity.
The advocate who frames arguments strictly around the child’s welfare — supported by admissible evidence — prevails more often than the one who dramatizes marital misconduct.
Leave a Reply